Showing posts with label Secretary Geithner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Secretary Geithner. Show all posts

The Congressional Republicans' Pledge: What if the Rubber Hit the Road?

Last night, we got a preview of the Congressional Republican “Pledge to America.” This morning – at a small business that would likely benefit from the President’s plan to help small businesses – they unveiled the full thing. As news reports have already noted, there weren’t many new ideas in it, and the document was largely fluff obscuring a return to the same old special interest policies that caused this recession. But a close look at what the real-life implications of their “pledge” would be if enacted are nothing short of alarming:

Cut Taxes for Millionaires and Billionaires While Adding Trillions to the Deficit: We have been through this before. So let’s be clear again. Under the Obama plan, every American family will receive a tax cut up to the first $250,000 of their income. For those who make more than $250,000, this change would leave their tax rates on income above $250,000 at or below the rates that existed when President Clinton was in office and when the economy created 23 million jobs. As for the Congressional Republican plan, their pledge is to continue hold middle class tax relief hostage in order to provide an average tax cut of $100,000 to millionaires and billionaires. And the price is one we simply can’t afford: $700 billion. This tax cut would be, according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, just about the worst way to jumpstart our economy and help create jobs.

Add Trillions to the Deficit: The Congressional Republican plan would add trillions to the deficit, including more than $1 trillion in additional unaffordable tax cuts over the next decade and more than $1 trillion in the subsequent decade from repealing the Affordable Care Act.

Raise Taxes for 110 Million American Families and Put Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs at Risk. As part of their pledge, Congressional Republicans want to cancel unspent Recovery Act funds and stop tens of thousands of job-creating projects, from highway construction to clean energy and environmental cleanup, putting the jobs of hundreds of thousands of Americans at risk. One key part of the remaining Recovery Act funds is the Making Work Pay tax credit. So cancelling all Recovery Act funds represents a pledge to raise taxes on over 110 million American families in every paycheck –a tax hike for the largest number of middle class Americans in history. Taxes for businesses on Main Street would go up, too. Tens of thousands of businesses across the country would see their taxes rise by $27 billion, making it harder to keep current employees and hire new ones. The Congressional Republican agenda puts the jobs of hundreds of thousands of Americans at risk, as Recovery Act funding would be pulled from tens of thousands of highway construction, clean energy, environmental clean-up, and other projects already underway in big cities and small towns across America. In addition, rolling back the Recovery Act would threaten the jobs of tens of thousands of Americans as clean energy businesses lose funding for solar plants, wind farms, battery factories and other projects across America.

Oppose Real Relief for Small Businesses: Congressional Republicans have consistently opposed the Administration’s efforts to cut taxes for small businesses. They voted against the 8 small business tax cuts the President has already signed, including tax cuts to encourage investment, job growth and health care. Following their event this morning, House Republican leaders will be voting – presumably against – another 8 small business tax cuts, including zero capital gains for key investments in small businesses. Instead of supporting these tax cuts, they’ve devised a bankrupt definition of ‘small business’ in an effort to justify unaffordable tax cuts for the rich. Let’s be clear what this proposal would do:

  • It would provide hedge fund managers, lobbyists and law partners a tax cut worth tens of thousands of dollars.
  • If you were one of the 25 highest paid hedge fund managers who took home $1 billion a year, this proposal could allow you to avoid paying a dime of taxes on $200 million of your income, while your secretaries and assistants continue paying taxes on all of their income.
  • This proposal could require us to borrow up to a half trillion dollars over ten years to pay for tax cuts that we cannot afford and that will not primarily help the real small businesses in this country.

Put Health Insurance Companies Back In Control: Congressional Republicans have pledged to repeal the Affordable Care Act and replace it with a series of special interest proposals under the guise of reform. This is a plan that would have real consequences for the American people and small businesses. Their agenda claims to protect people with preexisting conditions, but it would repeal the Affordable Care Act’s ban on discriminating against uninsured Americans, including children, who have a preexisting condition. It would raise taxes by more than $40 billion on up to 4 million small businesses that provide health benefits to their employees. It would result in premium increases by eliminating the billions of dollars in cost savings measures, and will increase the deficit by more than $1 trillion dollars. It would mean that seniors will pay more for their prescription drugs, and their new free preventive Medicare benefits would be cut. And it would mean that millions of Americans would have to give up their new Patient’s Bill of Rights protections that take effect today.

Return to the Era of Recklessness and Irresponsibility on Wall Street: Instead of supporting the Wall Street reform bill that would stop the practice of bailing out financial companies through programs like TARP, Congressional Republicans voted against it. Now, they are pledging to permanently end it. But TARP spending authority is already set to expire on October 3rd – less than two weeks from now – and thanks to the management of Secretary Geithner and the Treasury Department, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office expects the program to cost less than 10 percent of the $700 billion authorized. And the bank program, which was the subject of most controversy, is on track to make a substantial profit for taxpayers. The only thing it sounds like Congressional Republicans want to end is the Administration’s housing assistance program, which would mean 650,000 people will be denied a chance to receive a permanent mortgage modification that saves them an average of $500 per month.

Return to the Fiscal Policies that Turned a Record Surplus into a Record Deficit: Congressional Republicans have little credibility when it comes to dealing with our nation’s long-term fiscal challenges. After all, these are the same House Republicans who helped transform a record $236 billion surplus into a record $1.3 trillion deficit, by failing to pay for tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires, two wars and a costly expansion of Medicare. These are the same House Republicans who all voted against reinstating common sense Pay-As-You-Go rules that helped balance the budget during the Clinton Administration. And they are calling for this newfound responsibility in budgeting at the same time as they are pushing to add trillions to future deficits by repealing health reform and extending tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires. And when it comes to entitlements, let’s remember what their solution was when they were in charge: privatize Social Security and turn Medicare into a voucher program. And while some House Republican leaders are trying to distance themselves from their previous position in favor of privatization, others are continuing to push these same radical plans.

Return to Failed Budgets of the Past: After years of fiscal irresponsibility, Congressional Republicans are now pledging to stop their spending spree. But what they’ve proposed would return us to the same failed Bush policies that got us into this mess. Their plan would result in dramatic cuts in basic government services, including:

  • Head Start would have to slash 200,000 children from its rolls.
  • 110,000 fewer children from working families would receive child care subsidies.
  • The FBI would cut 2,700 agents.
  • Federal prisons would cut 3,800 correctional officers.
  • The Federal government could detain 12,000 fewer people because of their immigration status at any one time.
  • NASA would have to severely cut back its operations—cuts that would require the agency to abandon the international space station, immediately shut down the shuttle program, and eliminate aeronautics and cross-cutting space technology programs

Moving Forward on Housing Finance Reform

The housing industry is of vital importance to our country’s future. It is a key sector of our economy, supporting millions of jobs in construction, manufacturing, real estate, finance, and other industries. Moreover, for many Americans, their home is their largest financial investment.

That is why the Obama Administration is strongly committed to responsibly reforming our nation’s broken system of housing finance, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. And that is why it is so important that we get the reforms right.

Work on this issue is well under way, as the Obama Administration continues to develop a comprehensive reform proposal for delivery to Congress by January 2011. Earlier this year, Secretaries Geithner and Donovan testified before Congress, outlining the principles that will guide the Administration’s housing finance reform efforts. In April, the Treasury Department and the Department of Housing and Urban Development issued related questions for public comment, which have received over 300 responses from a broad cross-section of stakeholders. (To view these responses, please visit: here and here.)

That commitment to public engagement will continue. Today, the Administration is announcing that it will hold on August 17 a Conference on the Future of Housing Finance at the U.S. Treasury Department in Washington, D.C. This event will bring together leading academic experts, consumer and community organizations, industry groups, market participants, and other stakeholders for an open discussion about housing finance reform.

As we continue moving forward, it is critical to maintain an open, productive public dialogue about how best to address a housing finance system that everyone – across both sides of the aisle – agrees is in clear need of reform. To help inform this debate, it is useful to offer some context about the Administration’s efforts to date in this area and the current state of our nation’s housing finance system.

Stabilizing the Housing Market

In September 2008, the Bush Administration put Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into conservatorship and began injecting taxpayer funds into those firms in order to keep them afloat. When President Obama took office in January 2009, he inherited not only this conservatorship arrangement, but also a mortgage market and economy in free-fall.

From the beginning, the Obama Administration has made clear that the current structure of the government’s role in the housing finance market is unsustainable and unacceptable. Fundamental reform was clearly needed. But abrupt change or an uncertain reform process in the midst of the financial crisis could have destabilized an already fragile housing industry and made it even more difficult for Americans to buy a home or refinance a mortgage. Continuing to provide financial support to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was the right decision then for the mortgage market and for our economic recovery – and it has played a critical role in stabilizing the housing industry during a period of crisis. Even today, private capital has not yet fully returned to this market. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other government entities guarantee more than 90 percent of newly originated mortgages. They are practically the only game in town.

Fannie and Freddie under Conservatorship

During their two years in conservatorship, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been tightly supervised and regulated. Fannie and Freddie have made significant progress in improving the credit quality of their new obligations. Since 2008, FICO scores and loan-to-value ratios – both of which are key measures of how likely a borrower is to default – are meaningfully better on new mortgages. Fannie and Freddie have also increased their guarantee fees and risk-adjusted their pricing.

The losses that the federal government has had to backstop are virtually all attributable to bad loans that Fannie and Freddie took on between 2005 and 2007 – during the height of the housing bubble. Unfortunately, we still need to manage the continuing consequences of those poor credit choices.

Of course, none of these facts eliminate the need to take a hard and comprehensive look at long-term solutions for our nation’s system of housing finance. But they do offer important context about the numbers behind the headlines on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Responsible Reform

The size, importance, and complexity of the housing finance market all compel us to craft its reform with great care:

  • The U.S. mortgage market is the second largest securities market in the world, after U.S. Treasuries.
  • Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac currently guarantee more than $5 trillion in mortgages and hold a total of $1.6 trillion in agency loans and other securities in their portfolios.
  • Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are only one part of a broader housing finance system that includes the Federal Housing Administration, Ginnie Mae, the FHLBanks, other government programs, and a significant private sector role in originating, funding, and servicing mortgage loans.
  • For decades, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac privatized their profits while ultimately putting taxpayers at risk for losses. This type of “heads private shareholders win, tails taxpayers lose” system of misaligned incentives makes no sense for the nation.

Housing finance reform needs to address these and other complex issues responsibly. That is why the Obama Administration is committed to an open and inclusive public dialogue about the future of U.S. housing finance. Given the importance of this task, we want to hear the best ideas from all sides of the debate. Working together with our colleagues in Congress, we believe that this is the right path forward to achieve responsible reform.

Finish Line in Sight on Wall Street Reform

What a difference a year makes.Last June, President Obama unveiled a comprehensive proposal for financial reform, saying: Millions of Americans who've worked hard and behaved responsibly have seen their life dreams eroded by the irresponsibility of others and by the failure of their government to provide adequate oversight. Our entire economy has been undermined by that failure.So the question is, what do we do now? We did not choose how this crisis began, but we do have a choice in the legacy this crisis leaves behind. So today, my administration is proposing a sweeping overhaul of the financial regulatory system.

On that same day, President Obama ticked off his priorities for financial reform:

First, we're proposing a set of reforms to require regulators to look not only at the safety and soundness of individual institutions, but also -- for the first time -- at the stability of the financial system as a whole… Second, we're proposing a new and powerful agency charged with just one job: looking out for ordinary consumers….
Third, we're proposing a series of changes designed to promote free and fair markets by closing gaps and overlaps in our regulatory system -- including gaps that exist not just within but between nations.A lot of people wondered whether such an overhaul could actually be achieved. Even with our financial system undeniably broken, even with trillions in lost savings and millions of lost jobs, they wondered whether Washington could actually come together and get the job done.

Secretary Geithner warned against inaction: Every financial crisis of the last generation has sparked some effort at reform. But past efforts have begun too late, after the will to act has subsided. We cannot let that happen this time. We may disagree about the details, and we will have to work through those issues. But ordinary Americans have suffered too much; trust in our financial system has been too shaken; our economy has been brought too close to the brink for us to let this moment pass.

That’s why we have never let up in the fight for financial reform.

Look at where we are now, a year later, the finish line is in sight.

Right now a Congressional Conference Committee is in its second week of meetings. Thanks to the strong leadership of Chairman Dodd and Chairman Frank, as well as Chairwoman Lincoln and Chairman Peterson, the House and the Senate are tirelessly working through the last few remaining differences that exist between their bills.

In the coming days, they will reach agreement. And once that happens, the President will be able to sign into law the strongest set of financial reforms since those that followed the Great Depression.

We don’t have to wait until that day to know what reform will look like.

While some work remains to be done in Conference, the parameters of any final bill are largely set. And they largely follow the principles outlined by the President over a year ago.

For example, we already know that whatever bill comes to the President’s desk will end the problem of “too big to fail.” It will end taxpayer-funded bailouts. And it will make sure that American families and businesses never have to foot the bill for the irresponsibility of Wall Street.

We already know that the bill will give regulators the tools they need to curb risk-taking by financial institutions so that we can help prevent future crises.

We already know that the bill will put in place the strongest consumer financial protections in American history. It will make sure that consumers have the information they need to make informed decisions. And it will crack down on companies that take advantage of their customers

And we already know that the bill will create a safer, more transparent derivatives market, so that all of those transactions are brought out of the shadows and placed under strong supervision. It will also force derivatives dealers to hold capital against their risks so that financial firms will be accountable for the risks they take.

We know all this because all of it is already in the bills passed by the House and the Senate.

Everyone has a stake in financial reform. If you’re a family trying to buy your first house, a parent trying to fund your child’s education, an employee trying to save for retirement, or an entrepreneur trying to expand your business, you have a stake in financial reform.

Over the past two years, we have all lived through a devastating economic crisis. We have all learned important lessons. And when the President signs the final financial reform bill into law, he will have delivered on his commitment last year: to lay a new foundation for a stronger, safer financial system.